Freethinking for Dummies

Skepticism, secular humanism, social issues

Corporate “Personhood” Should Come With Responsibility of “Personhood”

The US Supreme Court plans to consider the lawsuit in a case that could be a landmark case that could make companies liable for torture or genocide committed overseas.

According to Discovery News,King Emere Godwin Bebe Okpabi of the Ogoni and four other tribal leaders seek compensation for half a century of pollution from oil extraction and processing that has sickened people and poisoned the land and drinking water.”

The plaintiffs are suing Royal Dutch Shell under the Alien Tort Claims Act of 1789, a law designed to assure foreign governments that the U.S. would uphold international law.

A lawyer for the defendants said that the law was intended to apply to persons, not corporations, but, as the Supreme Court declared last year, corporations are, legally, persons.  As far as I’m concerned if corporations can reap the benefits of personhood that come with pouring millions of dollars to influence elections, they should also assume the liability for the actions of their employes who commit crimes in other countries, just as they would if crimes were committed in this country.

About these ads

February 28, 2012 - Posted by | secular humanism, Social Justice | , , ,

4 Comments »

  1. This has been the biggest bone of contention about corporate personhood status – the rights versus the responsibilities. Corporations are really devoted to exercising their “rights”…but epic fail on living up to their responsibilities. The problem I see with SCOTUS in this is that SCOTUS has been quite favorable to corporations in the past several decades, which is disgusting.

    Comment by prosey | February 29, 2012 | Reply

  2. corporate personhood should also apply to union personhood….same principle

    Comment by kerry | March 7, 2012 | Reply

  3. I think that the only “personhood” should be for people, not companies, unions, churches, or any other organization.

    Comment by James Walker | March 7, 2012 | Reply

  4. I musy whole heartedly agree with the last statement you made Jay! This has been my point for a long time.. One vote–one PERSON

    Comment by kerry | March 12, 2012 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 391 other followers

%d bloggers like this: