Freethinking for Dummies

Skepticism, secular humanism, social issues

Religious Freedom: Your Rights Are Special; Your Religion Is Not

No one’s beliefs are beyond question or criticism.  Insisting on special special status for your religious beliefs has nothing to do with your freedom of religion and everything to do with your belief that your religion is somehow better than everyone else’s.  You have the freedom to believe what you choose and to live your life accordingly, unless you try to infringe upon the rights of others.  You do not have the freedom to insist that everyone else live by your beliefs.

I respect your right to believe as you wish but that respect only goes as far as me not trying to stop you from believing as you do, or insist that you believe as I do.  That respect does not include respect for your religion’s ideas, concepts, or particular moral code.

I expect you to question my beliefs and to challenge them.  I have no problems or qualms accepting your challenges to my beliefs.  I believe that if we don’t constantly question, we stagnate, then we stop learning and stop growing.  I question everything, even my own beliefs, constantly.  This brings a deeper understanding of myself and the world around me.

You, on the other hand, recoil in dismay when your beliefs are questioned and claim that you are being persecuted and that your right to freedom of religion is being infringed upon.  You are wrong.  Your beliefs are being questions, challenged, and even ridiculed.  Your right to believe them are not being questioned.  Your right to practice your beliefs and to worship are not being questioned.

Freedom of religion does not give your the right to insist that every public meeting or event be preceded with a prayer to your god.  It does not give you the right to insist that laws be passed to restrict the actions and speech of others not of your faith just because they don’t hold to the same moral beliefs as you.  Freedom of religion, as stated in the U.S. Constitution, also implies the freedom to have different religions, or even freedom from religion.  It implies freedom of conscience.

The Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution was enacted in order to prevent this country becoming a theocracy, as were most countries of Europe at the time, where Kings reigned by the grace of God.  The Founding Fathers,  in whose memories of the vicious religious wars of scant generations past were still a powerful and terrible memory, created the Establishment Clause to forestall just such terrible religious inspired strife in this country.

Today we see our society polarized by religiously motivated groups on the right who would push their vision of a Christian nation under their particular god upon all of us.  Their titular political arm, the Republican party, which once fought against religiously supported slavery, has now become a tool for those who breed hatred against,  homosexuals, the poor, women, and the non-christian or non-religious.  Their justification?  Their religion.  Their Bible.

Their belief that their Bible tells them that homosexuality is a sin worthy of death(1) that the poor will always be with us(2) and will be rewarded in heaven(3) and therefore somehow can be ignored here on earth); that women must be silent(4) and submit to their husbands(5). They claim that their god is a god of love and mercy.  Their Bible, their words, and their actions show otherwise; that their God is an angry, merciless, and vengeful god and that they are a bigoted, racist, misogynistic people who use their holy book to foist their twisted view of morality on the rest of us.

 

We all have the right to our own religion, our own beliefs.  We all have the right to worship as we wish.  We do not have the right, none of us, is to have our beliefs put up on a pedestal that is above question, challenge or even ridicule.  What none of us has is the privilege of having our special religious beliefs, modes of worship, and morals elevated above those of anyone else.  The freedom of religion granted by the U.S. Constitution implies, above all, equality of all beliefs, where no one belief or religion, especially that of majority, is above any other.

 

1 Leviticus 18 and 20

2 Matthew 26:11, Mark 14:7, John 12:8

3 Matthew 5:3, Luke 6:20

4 1 Corinthians 14:34

5 1 Peter 3:5

February 19, 2012 Posted by | Atheism, Feminism, GLBT, Humanism, Religion, secular humanism | , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Christianity, The Religion of Hate

One Man’s Blog posted about  a Fox News story describing a lawsuit to prevent a cross from being erected within the World Trade Center memorial without equal opportunity for memorials of other faiths.  The comments on the Fox News site afterwards were filled with hate against atheists with the wish to kill all atheists, along with rape and other violence.

My favorite (if you can call it that) comment came from Sindy Clock who wrote,

“I love Jesus, and the cross and if you don’t, I hope someone rapes you.”

I’ve read the Bible through, several times.  I studied the Bible on my own for years before finally dispensing with religion.  I am pretty sure I never read about Jesus ever telling anyone that if they didn’t believe in him that they should be raped.

Michael Perii had this to say,

“these people are f’ing scum of the earth. can we start killing them now?  few groups fill me with  more hatred than atheists.”

Apparently, Michael seems to have forgotten that passage where Jesus tells his followers that they should love their enemies (granted, we aren’t his enemy, he seems to have made us his).

Hanns Anderson has a, well, interesting take on this:

“atheist has no rights a snail has more rights than a atheist has I say throw them out to the sharks let them eat them like the ate bin laden”

Apparently,  being a Christian doesn’t require learning how to spell, punctuate, or even write at a grade school level.

Finally, Eileen Rourke thinks that atheists,

“…should go live in another country.  You have taken enough of my rights away.”

This last comment is so common among Christians.  Many Christians feel that their rights are being infringed upon because some of us dare to insist on equality, not just for ourselves, but for everyone.

Christians make up more than 70% of the citizens of this country.  It isn’t their rights that are being eroded, it is their privileges.  Being able to put crosses up where ever you want, to expect everyone else to pray to your god, is not a right.  It is a privilege, and one that no one in a free and democratic society should be allowed to have.

These comments are not an aberration.  We see these kind of comments constantly whenever their Christian privileges are questioned.   For a group of people who like to preach about how their Jesus a god of love, they sure love to hate.

February 5, 2012 Posted by | Atheism, Religion, Social Justice | , , , , | 1 Comment

Happy New Year in Hell

Not to be a buzz kill, but here is a very thought provoking article about hell and human decency.

Here is wishing all of you a Happy New Year!  Lets hope we see more tolerance and human decency this coming year.

December 31, 2011 Posted by | Atheism, Religion, secular humanism, Skepticism | , , | Leave a Comment

On Death

There is nothing when we die

No hell, no heaven up in the sky.

Dead is dead and this I know

Because the Bible tells me so.

“For to him that is joined to all the living there is hope; for a living dog is better than a dead lion. For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.” Ecclesiastes 9:4-5

 

December 26, 2011 Posted by | Atheism, Religion, Science, Skepticism | , , , | Leave a Comment

Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

“My chief consolation in this year of living dyingly has been the presence of friends,”.

Christopher Hitchens wrote this in the June 2011 issue of Vanity Fair.  Hitchens was in the presence of those friends when he passed away from complications due to esophageal cancer onThursday at the age of 62.

Hitchens was fearlessly outspoken on every topic he cared to cast his sharp, insightful mind on, wether it be atheism, Mother Teresa, or the latest health fad.  Not only was he outspoken, but he spoke more eloquently and persuasively than anyone I’ve ever heard.  His command of the English language, and his powerful and precise use of it was second to none.  He is the only modern author that I’ve read where I would need to look up a word at least every four or five pages.  Yet his vocabulary was never archaic or pedantic, but rich, flowing, and precise.

He is probably best known for his championing of atheism.  Considered one of the founders of the New Atheists, as well as one of the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse (along with Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennet), he was unapologetic, even harsh, in his criticism of religion and faith.  As he persuasively and beautifully put it:

“Faith is the surrender of the mind; it’s the surrender of reason, it’s the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other mammals. It’s our need to believe, and to surrender our skepticism and our reason, our yearning to discard that and put all our trust or faith in someone or something, that is the sinister thing to me. Of all the supposed virtues, faith must be the most overrated.”

He was reviled, yet often respected, by those of faith with whom he corresponded or debated.  Many of these, upon the announcement last year that he had terminal cancer, offered their prayers for him.  While he had no belief in prayer, rather than scoffing at them, he responded:

…that, if they want to pray for him, it’s fine by him. “I think of it as a nice gesture,” he said. “And it may well make them feel better, which is a good thing in itself.” (http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2010/sep/20/christopher-hitchens-prayers)

As always, he showed his great and deep understanding of humanity, both the good and the bad, and sought to expose it’s ills, while steadfastly supporting the inalienable human rights that we all share.

Others have eulogized him much better than I can.  Steven Novella beautifully states:

“His fellow materialists have to face this reality as well. Hitchens is gone. His brain – which was everything he thought, felt, remembered, and all the insight he had to offer the world – no longer functions, and never will function again. The same fate awaits us all. Without regret, Hitchens seemed to understand the flip side of this reality – we are the lucky few who get to live.  So make the most of it while you can.”

A sentiment Hitch would have totally agreed with.

PZ Myers plainly and persuasively wrote:

“Hitch is dead. We are a diminished people for the loss. There can be and should be no consolation, no soft words that encourage an illusion of heavenly rescue, no balm of lies. We should feel as we do with every death, that a part of us has been ripped from our hearts, and suffer pain and grief — and we are reminded that this is the fate we all face, that someday we too will die, and that we are all “living dyingly”, as Hitch put it so well.

As atheists, I think none of us can find solace in the cliches or numbness in the delusion of an afterlife. Instead, embrace the fierce strong emotions of anger and sorrow, feel the pain, rage against the darkness, fight back against our mortal enemy Death, and live exuberantly while we can. Confront mortality clear-eyed and pugnacious, uncompromising and aggressive.

It’s what Hitch would have wanted of us.

It’s how Hitch lived.”

The non-beleiving and humanist community has lost a great spokesperson, but more importantly, the world has lost a great human being.  I think the world would be a much better place if we could all follow Hitch’s example of living life to the fullest and fearlessly seeking justice for all of us.

 

December 17, 2011 Posted by | Atheism, Humanism, Religion, secular humanism, Skepticism, Social Justice | , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Atheists Raise $180,000 for Charity

It is said that this is the season of giving, and you don’t have to be religious to do good by giving.  It was reported the other day that atheists have used crowdsourcing to raise $180,000 for Doctors Without Borders. I bring this up because there is this prevalent belief that atheists are amoral, hedonistic, and only concerned with their own self interests.  I want to show that this belief is false.

I’m not going to try to pretend that atheists are more giving than their religious brethren, I just want people to realize that we, as a group in general, put a very high value on doing what is morally and ethically right.  Our understanding that this in the only life we have leads us to cherish it and, since we don’t believe in any finally judgement where the bad will be punished and the good rewarded, we are greatly appalled at the suffering of others in the here and now.  We see the huge injustice that millions are living lives of desperation, with no hope of relief, unless we, as fellow human beings do something about it, today.  Nothing is more terrible than the thought that so many innocent people suffer and that a painful death is all that many of them have to look forward to.  The waste of human life, of human potential is overwhelming.  When you know that this time on earth is all that each of us has, this kind horrible waste and suffering is unconscionable.

The fact that this suffering of millions is often brushed aside because people delude themselves into believing that those who suffer will find peace some other future existence is what makes us so angry.  We aren’t angry with god, or with believers in general.  We are angry that human suffering is often minimized by reference to some insubstantial afterlife, or worse, justified by the whim of some invisible deity.

We give what we can to help those who suffer, not because we are told to by a holy book, or a church, but because we are moved by a shared sense of humanity to do what is right simply because it is the right thing to do.

There are plenty of charities that you can give to, if you are, like me, uncomfortable with the idea of giving to a religious charity, such as the Salvation Army, which espouses homophobic and bigoted beliefs, or a church where most of the money stays in the church rather than going to where it is really needed.  My personal choice is Doctors Without Borders, which I believe is a great charity since they provide needed medical care anywhere in the world that it is needed, with no religious, ideological, or political agenda or strings attached.

Where ever you decide to give to, don’t do it because you expect some ineffable reward in a nebulous, unlikely afterlife, or to please your pastor.  Do it because it is the right thing to do.

December 12, 2011 Posted by | Atheism, Humanism, Religion, secular humanism, Social Justice | , , , , | Leave a Comment

Putting The Yule Back Into Christmas

yuletide_by_teews666-d35l1k2

It’s that time of year again.  This is the time when those representing the 70% of the population in the U.S. start complaining about businesses, government, and individuals who decide to say, “Happy Holidays!”, instead of “Merry Christmas!”.   The fact that businesses have decided that they wish to cater to ALL of their potential customers (you know, other 30% of us), instead of just the 70% who identify as Christians seems to escape them.  But even ignoring the good business sense to include everyone, there are plenty of reasons to celebrate the Holidays, instead of just Christmas.

At this time of year we find Hanukkah and Kwanza, two very important religious and culturally important celebrations that fall this time of year.  The most important celebration that falls this time of year, though, is the Winter Solstice.  This has been celebrated for thousands upon thousands of years by cultures throughout northern hemisphere.

Yule its self is of Nordic-germanic roots, but winter festivals were common throughout Europe.  In 46 BCE, Julius Caesar in his Julian calendar established December 25 as the date of the winter solstice of Europe.  This date was adopted by the Catholic Church as the day for the Feast of the Christ, or Christmas.   Almost all of the things we associate with Christmas celebrations are derived from pagan customs, including decorating trees and gift giving.

abstinence_is_futile_by_teews666-d3g0him

Even the Bible story of the Virgin Birth has its roots in much older traditions.  As the irreverent graphic above points out, the idea of a god/savior being born to a virgin is not at all uniquely Christian.

It is proper, therefore, to celebrate the “Holidays”.  If these crying Christians wish to celebrate Christmas exclusively, that is perfectly fine, but please don’t try to tell me that I can’t celebrate Yule, the Winter Solstice, or any other holiday I want to this time of year.  I mean, come on now, lighten up and have a cup of nog!

- Much thanks to Varun Sankhe for the graphics!

December 8, 2011 Posted by | Atheism, Religion, Skepticism | , , , | 3 Comments

The (Believers) Problem of Evil

Isaiah 45:7

King James Version (KJV)

I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

For those who believe in a god, especially a loving, merciful god, evil is a real problem.  Some say that satan causes evil in the world, others that evil is god’s way of testing our faith.

As far as I can see it, these, and other arguments like them, all fall flat.  I could write a whole book against these arguments (and many have), but instead, I think my position can be summed up with the following quote attributed to Epicuris:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

The first quote, from Isaiah, pretty much shows that the god who Christians like to claim as being a god of love, is also a god of evil.  Their Bible is pretty unequivical about it: the LORD creates evil.  It really can’t be any other way, if, as they say, their god created everything, for by default, he must have created evil as well as good.

To surrender the cause of evil to an unseen and amorphous entity is to refuse to take any responsibility for the evil that humans visit upon each other.  When you accept that evil is a product of human activity, you can then look it straight in the eyes and tackle it head on, instead of pawning it off to an imaginary god or gods.

There are many reasons that I am an atheist; there is my love of science, my thirst for knowledge, and my instance on truth, no matter how ugly it may be.  Still, the two quotes above make a very powerful, yet simple, argument against believing in any god or gods.  They are a beginning point for shuffling off the imaginary coil of belief and moving onto a life of real responsibility those with who we share this planet.

December 3, 2011 Posted by | Atheism, Religion, Science, Skepticism | , , , , , , | 2 Comments

An Atheist Crest

I think this would make a great atheist crest.

Cogito_ergo_non_ovis_by_Ranger_Roger

By ranger-roger

 

November 8, 2011 Posted by | Atheism | | 4 Comments

I Chose Not To Believe

I think that the one of the most compelling reasons that I have chosen not be believe in any supernatural god(s) can best be summed up by the picture below.  Look at it. Think really hard about it.  If you do you will begin to understand what lead me to shed my supersitious beliefs.

poly_atheism_demotivational_by_hull612-d39xom1

By hull612 (Otherwise known as Jon)

November 4, 2011 Posted by | Atheism, Humanism, Religion, secular humanism | , , , , , | 5 Comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 69 other followers